Recall elections would no longer include a question about who should fill the vacancy. Instead, vacancies typically would be filled through special elections or appointments, depending on the office and timing.
CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS.
Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment.
Yes or No, in the state's words
Voters would continue to be asked who should fill the vacancy as part of recall elections.
What the state says it may cost or change
Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.
Read the full analysis
The Quick Reference Guide does not publish a separate current-law sentence for this proposition. Election.org does not infer one. The Legislative Analyst's analysis in the official proposition PDF explains the baseline law.
Open official analysis ↗Placed by the Legislature
The official guide labels this measure as put on the ballot by the Legislature. This is a source classification, not an Election.org judgment.
Not available before Election Day
This election is upcoming. Election.org will not show a blank or zero as a result.
Who the official quick guide lists
None submitted
None submitted
Arguments are the opinions of their authors and have not been checked for accuracy by an official agency.
