Home/Federal committees/BOOTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

BOOTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Leadership PACFEC C00567545
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has BOOTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE reported?

$851,440.20 in total receipts and $768,818.61 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$851,440
Total spending$768,819
Independent expenditures$0
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through July 31, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$851,440.20All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$199,141.65Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$306,500.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$768,818.61All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committees$250,000.00Contributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expenditures$0.00Spending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$389,010.28Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Itemized political activity

Candidate giving and outside spending by BOOTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

FEC ITEMIZED DATA

The categories below remain separate: contributions go to a recipient committee; independent expenditures are outside activity reported as supporting or opposing a candidate.

Direct candidate contributions$215,000.0051 transactions
Coordinated party spending$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to support$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to oppose$0.000 transactions
Direct contribution

Money reported as given to a candidate or candidate committee. It enters the recipient committee’s campaign-finance record.

Coordinated party expenditure

Party spending reported in the FEC’s coordinated-expenditure category. It is separate from a direct contribution.

Independent expenditure

Outside spending expressly supporting or opposing a candidate. By definition, it is not made in coordination with the candidate or party.

Direct contributions by candidate

Ashley Hinson Arenholz2 itemized transactions · latest Sep 3, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Ashley Moody2 itemized transactions · latest Feb 24, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Cindy Hyde-Smith2 itemized transactions · latest Jul 28, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Elise M. Stefanik2 itemized transactions · latest Nov 1, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Harriet Hageman2 itemized transactions · latest Jan 30, 2026
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
James E Mr. Risch2 itemized transactions · latest Jul 11, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Jon Husted2 itemized transactions · latest Feb 24, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Lindsey O. Graham2 itemized transactions · latest Mar 14, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Michael Alfonso2 itemized transactions · latest Jan 30, 2026
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Michael J Rogers2 itemized transactions · latest Sep 8, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Michael Whatley2 itemized transactions · latest Sep 3, 2025
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗
Michele Tafoya2 itemized transactions · latest Jan 30, 2026
$10,000.00FEC filing ↗

Source: FEC contributions-from-committees-to-candidates and independent-expenditure bulk files, checked Aug 24, 2026. The totals shown here sum the itemized current-file rows displayed by category; they are not substituted for the committee’s official summary totals.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through BOOTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

10 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

51.8% outside Virginia
Virginia31 distinct reported contributors · 37 rows$53,375.0048.2%
Oklahoma8 distinct reported contributors · 21 rows$23,600.0021.3%
District of Columbia12 distinct reported contributors · 20 rows$20,625.0018.6%
Maryland8 distinct reported contributors · 13 rows$13,165.0011.9%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

3 published categories
Administrative/Salary/Overhead Expenses157 current organization-payment rows$502,768.99
Category not reported1 current organization-payment row$10,000.00
Campaign Event Expenses1 current organization-payment row$250.00

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Bb And T Truist Credit Card94 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-08
$234,593.61
Grand Valley Consulting LLC10 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-31
$104,069.97
Wichita Falls Asap LLC3 current itemized payments · latest 2025-12-17
$67,702.26
Southern Plains Advocacy7 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-26
$32,976.24
Camp Political LLC5 current itemized payments · latest 2026-01-23
$26,000.00
Huckaby Davis Lisker2 current itemized payments · latest 2025-12-22
$23,581.63
Chef Andrew Black1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-05-13
$10,000.00
Anedot17 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-03
$5,456.55
Outlier Brands LLC1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-05-13
$2,674.92
Aristotle International3 current itemized payments · latest 2025-12-22
$2,250.00
Gr Pro LLC1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-03-03
$2,230.61
Truist14 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-21
$1,233.20
General Dynamics1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-12-17
$250.00

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
PAC — qualified · code Q
Designation
Leadership PAC · code D
Filing frequency
Monthly filer
Party affiliation
Not listed
Connected organization
MULLIN VICTORY FUND
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
LISKER, LISA
Mailing address
228 S. WASHINGTON ST., STE. 115, ALEXANDRIA VA 22314
FEC committee ID
C00567545
How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.