Home/Federal committees/CLEAR VOICE MINNESOTA
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

CLEAR VOICE MINNESOTA

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Super PACFEC C00912477
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has CLEAR VOICE MINNESOTA reported?

$249,125.00 in total receipts and $233,590.61 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$249,125
Total spending$233,591
Independent expenditures$175,000
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through June 30, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$249,125.00All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$219,125.00Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$30,000.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$233,590.61All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committees$0.00Contributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expenditures$175,000.00Spending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$15,534.39Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Itemized political activity

Candidate giving and outside spending by CLEAR VOICE MINNESOTA

FEC ITEMIZED DATA

The categories below remain separate: contributions go to a recipient committee; independent expenditures are outside activity reported as supporting or opposing a candidate.

Direct candidate contributions$0.000 transactions
Coordinated party spending$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to support$133,000.005 transactions
Independent spending to oppose$200,000.008 transactions
Direct contribution

Money reported as given to a candidate or candidate committee. It enters the recipient committee’s campaign-finance record.

Coordinated party expenditure

Party spending reported in the FEC’s coordinated-expenditure category. It is separate from a direct contribution.

Independent expenditure

Outside spending expressly supporting or opposing a candidate. By definition, it is not made in coordination with the candidate or party.

Independent expenditures by candidate and position

opposeAngie Craig8 itemized transactions · latest Aug 7, 2026
$200,000.00FEC filing ↗
supportMargaret Flanagan5 itemized transactions · latest Aug 7, 2026
$133,000.00FEC filing ↗
SPONSOR-LEVEL SOURCE ROWS13 reported communication-spending records

Search exact payees, purposes, candidate IDs, dates, positions, and filing images.

Browse every filing row →Open latest record →

Source: FEC contributions-from-committees-to-candidates and independent-expenditure bulk files, checked Aug 24, 2026. The totals shown here sum the itemized current-file rows displayed by category; they are not substituted for the committee’s official summary totals.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through CLEAR VOICE MINNESOTA

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

3 published categories
Administrative/Salary/Overhead Expenses28 current organization-payment rows$31,546.74
Advertising Expenses2 current organization-payment rows$14,278.38
Polling Expenses1 current organization-payment row$12,500.00

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
New Media Firm Incorporated4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-28
$19,211.95
Perkey Group LLC2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-02-09
$16,150.70
Public Policy Polling1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-02-04
$12,500.00
Commoncentsconsulting LLC11 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-22
$5,500.00
Integrated Solutions Political8 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-02
$2,870.97
Sandler Reiff Rosenstein And Birkenstock P C2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-19
$1,040.00
Actblue Technical Services1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-02-06
$987.50
Amalgamated Bank2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-29
$64.00

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
Super PAC — independent expenditure-only · code O
Designation
Unauthorized committee · code U
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
Not listed
Connected organization
NONE
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
MCCUBBIN, JEREMIE
Mailing address
PO BOX 26430, TEMPE AZ 85285
FEC committee ID
C00912477
How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.