Home/Federal committees/DEM TURNOUT 2026
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

DEM TURNOUT 2026

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Hybrid PACFEC C00894295
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has DEM TURNOUT 2026 reported?

$4,586,300.30 in total receipts and $4,384,682.69 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$4,586,300
Total spending$4,384,683
Independent expenditures$0
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through June 30, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$4,586,300.30All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$4,461,168.70Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$0.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$4,384,682.69All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committees$0.00Contributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expenditures$0.00Spending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$201,617.61Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through DEM TURNOUT 2026

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

17 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

96.4% outside Illinois
California751 distinct reported contributors · 10,673 rows$297,725.0021.7%
New York236 distinct reported contributors · 4,690 rows$103,435.007.5%
Texas187 distinct reported contributors · 3,283 rows$89,952.006.6%
Florida222 distinct reported contributors · 2,776 rows$72,708.005.3%
Washington171 distinct reported contributors · 2,440 rows$61,272.004.5%
Pennsylvania123 distinct reported contributors · 1,837 rows$53,648.003.9%
Illinois124 distinct reported contributors · 1,898 rows$49,351.003.6%
Michigan106 distinct reported contributors · 2,097 rows$40,999.003.0%
Massachusetts111 distinct reported contributors · 1,658 rows$38,896.002.8%
Ohio96 distinct reported contributors · 2,072 rows$35,885.002.6%
Maryland84 distinct reported contributors · 1,706 rows$35,302.002.6%
Colorado80 distinct reported contributors · 829 rows$34,608.002.5%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

1 published categories
Category not reported241 current organization-payment rows$2,386,122.66

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Mothership Strategies43 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-05
$1,900,294.65
Actblue Technical Services164 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$175,599.47
American Express15 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$153,777.00
Message Digital2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-07
$54,200.00
Validity Incorporated1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-06-17
$33,475.00
Bluebird Technologies LLC3 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-14
$32,258.91
Harry Pascal Ltd5 current itemized payments · latest 2026-02-02
$28,000.00
Harry A Pascal Ltd1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-04-05
$6,000.00
Elias Law Group1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-04-04
$1,761.00
Amalgamated Bank5 current itemized payments · latest 2025-10-23
$426.63
Elias Law1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-12-12
$330.00

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
Hybrid PAC — non-contribution account · code V
Designation
Unauthorized committee · code U
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
Not listed
Connected organization
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
PASCAL, HARRY
Mailing address
PO BOX 5327, EVANSTON IL 60204
FEC committee ID
C00894295
How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.