Home/Federal committees/FRIENDS OF ALEX HAWKINS
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

FRIENDS OF ALEX HAWKINS

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeDEMFEC C00896704
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has FRIENDS OF ALEX HAWKINS reported?

$376,391.17 in total receipts and $376,391.17 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$376,391
Total spending$376,391
Independent expendituresNot reported
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through September 30, 2025.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$376,391.17All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$351,176.05Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$0.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$376,391.17All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committeesNot reportedContributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expendituresNot reportedSpending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$0.00Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through FRIENDS OF ALEX HAWKINS

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

7 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

24.1% outside Michigan
Michigan40 distinct reported contributors · 74 rows$43,460.0075.9%
California12 distinct reported contributors · 16 rows$7,152.0012.5%
Texas8 distinct reported contributors · 9 rows$3,350.005.8%
New York10 distinct reported contributors · 14 rows$3,330.005.8%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

1 published categories
Category not reported133 current organization-payment rows$357,358.77

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Grassroots Analytics7 current itemized payments · latest 2025-07-08
$227,744.54
Payroll Data Processing20 current itemized payments · latest 2025-09-29
$27,974.56
Spruce Street Compliance5 current itemized payments · latest 2025-09-29
$25,488.98
Paychex15 current itemized payments · latest 2025-05-15
$18,370.48
Actblue Technical Services35 current itemized payments · latest 2025-09-29
$13,066.63
Ngp Van Incorporated9 current itemized payments · latest 2025-09-04
$10,360.00
American Express5 current itemized payments · latest 2025-09-16
$5,618.34
Stage Left Strategies2 current itemized payments · latest 2025-09-10
$4,125.00
Scale To Win4 current itemized payments · latest 2025-08-04
$4,026.77
Hopkins Sachs2 current itemized payments · latest 2025-03-04
$3,703.80
Michigan Democratic State Central Committee1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-02-10
$2,000.00
Progressive Policy Partners LLC1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-09-12
$2,000.00
Ripple Effect Strategies1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-03-14
$2,000.00
Bergmann Zwerdling Direct5 current itemized payments · latest 2025-03-21
$1,970.97
Moore Campaigns1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-06-11
$1,797.88

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
House campaign committee · code H
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Terminated
Party affiliation
DEM
Connected organization
Not listed
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
PERRONE, VICTORIA
Mailing address
PO BOX 82343, ROCHESTER MI 48308
FEC committee ID
C00896704
Connected records

Candidate records linked in FEC data

A candidate link comes from the committee or candidate master record. For a leadership PAC, association with a candidate does not make the committee an authorized candidate committee.

How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.