Home/Federal committees/GRANTHAM FOR CONGRESS
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

GRANTHAM FOR CONGRESS

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeREPFEC C00497628
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has GRANTHAM FOR CONGRESS reported?

$613,369.13 in total receipts and $558,997.95 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$613,369
Total spending$558,998
Independent expendituresNot reported
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through June 30, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$613,369.13All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$352,869.13Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$7,000.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$558,997.95All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committeesNot reportedContributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expendituresNot reportedSpending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$54,520.17Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$311,911.50Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through GRANTHAM FOR CONGRESS

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

12 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

25.7% outside Arizona
Arizona120 distinct reported contributors · 141 rows$156,995.0074.3%
New York5 distinct reported contributors · 18 rows$18,300.008.7%
Texas18 distinct reported contributors · 41 rows$9,635.004.6%
California18 distinct reported contributors · 31 rows$8,583.004.1%
Pennsylvania7 distinct reported contributors · 22 rows$5,933.002.8%
Illinois6 distinct reported contributors · 11 rows$5,275.002.5%
Massachusetts5 distinct reported contributors · 15 rows$2,605.001.2%
New Jersey7 distinct reported contributors · 16 rows$1,555.000.7%
Virginia7 distinct reported contributors · 10 rows$1,270.000.6%
Florida10 distinct reported contributors · 19 rows$1,225.000.6%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

1 published categories
Category not reported129 current organization-payment rows$287,833.97

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Direct Support Services15 current itemized payments · latest 2026-02-26
$98,485.54
Consolidated Mailing Services19 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-01
$64,003.60
Rmc17 current itemized payments · latest 2026-03-09
$37,770.60
Grassroots Partners7 current itemized payments · latest 2025-12-01
$20,740.10
Twelve Oaks4 current itemized payments · latest 2025-11-06
$14,554.40
Huckaby Davis Lisker4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-08
$11,416.26
Forthright Strategy1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-05-13
$10,000.00
Direct Support Systems Incorporated4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-09
$7,946.39
Aristotle International4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-06
$5,500.00
Capitol Caging Corporation10 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-06
$4,788.81
Anedot9 current itemized payments · latest 2025-12-31
$4,275.85
First Virginia Community Bank19 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-01
$2,048.86
Madera Escrow LLC9 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-09
$1,862.48
Legacy Lists Incorporated1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-07-17
$1,573.55
Victory Enterprises1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-08-05
$1,311.75

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
House campaign committee · code H
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
REP
Connected organization
NONE
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
SATTERFIELD, DAVID
Mailing address
PO BOX 267, GILBERT AZ 85299
FEC committee ID
C00497628
Connected records

Candidate records linked in FEC data

A candidate link comes from the committee or candidate master record. For a leadership PAC, association with a candidate does not make the committee an authorized candidate committee.

How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.