Election.orgCampaign money
Home/Federal committees/SETH FOR MASSACHUSETTS, INC
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

SETH FOR MASSACHUSETTS, INC

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeDEMFEC C00547240
Financial snapshot · 2025–2026 cycle

How much has SETH FOR MASSACHUSETTS, INC reported?

$6,213,102.88 received · $6,228,105.21 spent

Total receipts
$6,213,103

Money received this cycle

Total spending
$6,228,105

Reported disbursements

Cash on hand
$1,835,336

At the filing period’s end

These are reported committee totals—not a measure of who benefited from every dollar. Candidate support and opposition appear separately in itemized spending records, which may cover later dates.

Through · Last successful import

Registration · not a corporate staff directory

Who is the committee’s reported treasurer?

GILLIGAN, TARA is the treasurer listed for this political committee in the included FEC registration data.

This is the political committee’s treasurer—not necessarily the treasurer or finance director of an organization with a similar name. This record does not establish a current corporate or public-office appointment.

Registration data retrieved October 16, 2026. Check the FEC’s latest registration and filings ↗

Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through August 12, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$6,213,102.88All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$5,853,522.29Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$241,200.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$6,228,105.21All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Cash on hand$1,835,335.73Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Itemized political activity

Candidate giving and outside spending by SETH FOR MASSACHUSETTS, INC

FEC ITEMIZED DATA

The categories below remain separate: contributions go to a recipient committee; independent expenditures are outside activity reported as supporting or opposing a candidate.

Direct candidate contributions$168.001 transactions
Coordinated party spending$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to support$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to oppose$0.000 transactions
Direct contribution

Money reported as given to a candidate or candidate committee. It enters the recipient committee’s campaign-finance record.

Coordinated party expenditure

Party spending reported in the FEC’s coordinated-expenditure category. It is separate from a direct contribution.

Independent expenditure

Outside spending expressly supporting or opposing a candidate. By definition, it is not made in coordination with the candidate or party.

Direct contributions by candidate

Jamie Raskin1 itemized transaction · latest Jul 21, 2025

Source: FEC contributions-from-committees-to-candidates and independent-expenditure bulk files, checked Oct 16, 2026. The totals shown here sum the itemized current-file rows displayed by category; they are not substituted for the committee’s official summary totals.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through SETH FOR MASSACHUSETTS, INC

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

20 calendar months · 20 published cells

Only committee/month cells with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. A missing cell can reflect source absence or the privacy threshold; it does not mean zero activity. Published amounts are unchanged.

Source: FEC individual-contributions bulk file ↗, imported . This panel does not include PAC receipts.

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

50.1% of published positive state-cell amounts outside Massachusetts
Massachusetts1,665 distinct reported contributors · 3,055 rows$2,658,678.0049.9%
New York330 distinct reported contributors · 574 rows$833,909.0015.6%
California300 distinct reported contributors · 526 rows$638,532.0012.0%
Florida115 distinct reported contributors · 195 rows$314,681.005.9%
Texas53 distinct reported contributors · 92 rows$128,158.002.4%
District of Columbia71 distinct reported contributors · 94 rows$116,527.002.2%
Maryland56 distinct reported contributors · 68 rows$97,550.001.8%
Virginia83 distinct reported contributors · 123 rows$91,434.001.7%
Connecticut36 distinct reported contributors · 51 rows$73,250.001.4%
Illinois37 distinct reported contributors · 60 rows$60,999.001.1%
New Jersey25 distinct reported contributors · 38 rows$50,505.000.9%
New Hampshire30 distinct reported contributors · 67 rows$45,474.000.9%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. Percentages divide by the sum of all positive published, privacy-thresholded committee/state cells, including cells beyond the top 12 shown. Zero and negative state cells are excluded from this denominator; these shares do not describe all contributions or all campaign receipts.

Source: FEC individual-contributions bulk file ↗, imported .

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

2 published categories
Administrative/Salary/Overhead Expenses587 current organization-payment rows$5,301,309.21
Category not reported317 current organization-payment rows$740,722.97

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Buying Time5 current itemized payments · latest 2026-08-07
$1,347,461.00
Gusto Incorporated30 current itemized payments · latest 2026-08-07
$650,798.02
Gusto118 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-24
$619,117.62
Orlattle LLC6 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-31
$486,478.39
Kinetic Strategies LLC16 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-10
$313,418.15
Frost Group40 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-26
$257,436.07
Chase Card Services17 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-21
$221,081.28
Actblue Technical Services116 current itemized payments · latest 2026-08-12
$199,859.40
Northwind Stratagies10 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-10
$195,000.00
Mcgreen Strategies LLC12 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-02
$164,458.91
Mellman Group4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-24
$155,497.05
American Express Travel13 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-20
$108,711.59
Mellman Group Incorporated2 current itemized payments · latest 2025-08-29
$105,900.00
Scale To Win Incorporated7 current itemized payments · latest 2026-08-05
$102,482.40
Jones Mandel11 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-10
$93,342.56

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-10-16. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Aggregated individual giving · privacy threshold applied

Reported employers among contributors to SETH FOR MASSACHUSETTS, INC

FEC SCHEDULE A
This is not company money.

These totals combine itemized contributions from individuals who reported the same employer. They do not show that the employer directed, funded, or endorsed any contribution.

Fidelity Investments27 distinct reported contributors · 31 current itemized transactions
$30,950.00
Bain Capital8 distinct reported contributors · 12 current itemized transactions
$26,431.00
Harvard University16 distinct reported contributors · 38 current itemized transactions
$22,600.00
Leidos34 distinct reported contributors · 36 current itemized transactions
$21,750.00
Charlesbank Capital Partners6 distinct reported contributors · 7 current itemized transactions
$20,600.00
Harvard5 distinct reported contributors · 6 current itemized transactions
$19,000.00
Harvard Business School6 distinct reported contributors · 9 current itemized transactions
$19,000.00
Mit8 distinct reported contributors · 12 current itemized transactions
$13,620.00
Fidelity6 distinct reported contributors · 10 current itemized transactions
$10,150.00
Google5 distinct reported contributors · 8 current itemized transactions
$9,138.00

Only employer/recipient groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published, with at most 50 groups per recipient committee. Individual names and addresses are not included. Totals are net current-file amounts after amendment normalization and may include refunds, reattributions, or memo entries.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
Senate campaign committee · code S
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
Democratic Party
Connected organization
MOULTON LEADERSHIP FUND
Treasurer
GILLIGAN, TARA
Mailing address
PO BOX 2013, SALEM MA 01970
FEC committee ID
C00547240
How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.