Election.orgCampaign money
Home/Federal committees/STANTON FOR CONGRESS
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

STANTON FOR CONGRESS

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeDEMFEC C00657304
Financial snapshot · 2025–2026 cycle

How much has STANTON FOR CONGRESS reported?

$2,603,086.34 received · $1,709,122.08 spent

Total receipts
$2,603,086

Money received this cycle

Total spending
$1,709,122

Reported disbursements

Cash on hand
$1,909,695

At the filing period’s end

These are reported committee totals—not a measure of who benefited from every dollar. Candidate support and opposition appear separately in itemized spending records, which may cover later dates.

Through · Last successful import

Registration · not a corporate staff directory

Who is the committee’s reported treasurer?

FOUCART, BRIAN is the treasurer listed for this political committee in the included FEC registration data.

This is the political committee’s treasurer—not necessarily the treasurer or finance director of an organization with a similar name. This record does not establish a current corporate or public-office appointment.

Registration data retrieved October 16, 2026. Check the FEC’s latest registration and filings ↗

Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through September 30, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$2,603,086.34All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$1,791,460.59Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$804,200.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$1,709,122.08All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Cash on hand$1,909,694.72Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Itemized political activity

Candidate giving and outside spending by STANTON FOR CONGRESS

FEC ITEMIZED DATA

The categories below remain separate: contributions go to a recipient committee; independent expenditures are outside activity reported as supporting or opposing a candidate.

Direct candidate contributions$66,000.0051 transactions
Coordinated party spending$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to support$0.000 transactions
Independent spending to oppose$0.000 transactions
Direct contribution

Money reported as given to a candidate or candidate committee. It enters the recipient committee’s campaign-finance record.

Coordinated party expenditure

Party spending reported in the FEC’s coordinated-expenditure category. It is separate from a direct contribution.

Independent expenditure

Outside spending expressly supporting or opposing a candidate. By definition, it is not made in coordination with the candidate or party.

Direct contributions by candidate

Josh Riley4 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Adam Gray2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Janelle S. Bynum2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Derek Tran2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Donald G. Davis2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Emilia Strong Sykes2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Eugene Simon Vindman2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Frank J. Mrvan2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Gabe Vasquez2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
George Whitesides2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
Jahana Hayes2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025
John W. Mannion2 itemized transactions · latest Dec 17, 2025

Showing 12 of 31 groups, ordered by absolute reported amount. Totals include all accepted source rows.

Source: FEC contributions-from-committees-to-candidates and independent-expenditure bulk files, checked Oct 16, 2026. The totals shown here sum the itemized current-file rows displayed by category; they are not substituted for the committee’s official summary totals.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through STANTON FOR CONGRESS

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

19 calendar months · 19 published cells

Only committee/month cells with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. A missing cell can reflect source absence or the privacy threshold; it does not mean zero activity. Published amounts are unchanged.

Source: FEC individual-contributions bulk file ↗, imported . This panel does not include PAC receipts.

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

10.2% of published positive state-cell amounts outside Arizona
Arizona901 distinct reported contributors · 1,950 rows$1,176,645.0089.8%
California47 distinct reported contributors · 65 rows$75,515.005.8%
Virginia16 distinct reported contributors · 21 rows$20,000.001.5%
District of Columbia20 distinct reported contributors · 32 rows$18,700.001.4%
Texas6 distinct reported contributors · 7 rows$16,500.001.3%
New York5 distinct reported contributors · 9 rows$3,505.000.3%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. Percentages divide by the sum of all positive published, privacy-thresholded committee/state cells, including cells beyond the top 12 shown. Zero and negative state cells are excluded from this denominator; these shares do not describe all contributions or all campaign receipts.

Source: FEC individual-contributions bulk file ↗, imported .

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

1 published categories
Category not reported659 current organization-payment rows$661,456.75

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Frost Group24 current itemized payments · latest 2025-10-30
$85,575.98
Rising Tide Interactive1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-06-25
$75,000.00
Adp111 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$69,877.56
American Express7 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-15
$53,160.32
Ngp Van Incorporated11 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-11
$48,881.95
Actblue Technical Services130 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-01
$46,359.42
Conrad Group9 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-17
$45,000.00
Pcms LLC18 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-06
$40,938.70
Csig LLC4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-29
$35,000.00
Blue Scout Digital LLC14 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-07
$28,350.00
Spiros Consulting2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-21
$21,000.00
True Blue Analytics2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-20
$12,000.00
New Majority Partners1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-02-18
$10,000.00
Kettle Heroes1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-12-30
$8,345.94
Convergence Targeted Communications4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-29
$5,916.81

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-10-16. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Aggregated individual giving · privacy threshold applied

Reported employers among contributors to STANTON FOR CONGRESS

FEC SCHEDULE A
This is not company money.

These totals combine itemized contributions from individuals who reported the same employer. They do not show that the employer directed, funded, or endorsed any contribution.

Srp15 distinct reported contributors · 16 current itemized transactions
$10,500.00
Snell And Wilmer7 distinct reported contributors · 10 current itemized transactions
$9,750.00
Salt River Project10 distinct reported contributors · 10 current itemized transactions
$5,750.00
Arizona State University6 distinct reported contributors · 9 current itemized transactions
$2,850.00
Snell And Wilmer LLP5 distinct reported contributors · 8 current itemized transactions
$2,500.00

Only employer/recipient groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published, with at most 50 groups per recipient committee. Individual names and addresses are not included. Totals are net current-file amounts after amendment normalization and may include refunds, reattributions, or memo entries.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
House campaign committee · code H
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
Democratic Party
Connected organization
STANTON ACTION FUND
Treasurer
FOUCART, BRIAN
Mailing address
4340 E INDIAN SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 21-518, PHOENIX AZ 85018
FEC committee ID
C00657304
Connected records

Candidate records linked in FEC data

A candidate link comes from the committee or candidate master record. For a leadership PAC, association with a candidate does not make the committee an authorized candidate committee.

How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.