Election.orgLocal government
Los Angeles/2026 election/Charter Amendment PRK
MEASUREPRK
Los Angeles · Nov 3, 2026 · upcoming

City Department of Recreation and Parks Budget

Charter Amendment PRK

OFFICIAL BALLOT QUESTION

What voters will be asked

Shall the City Charter be amended to increase the minimum budget allocated to the Department of Recreation and Parks, phased in over ten years until it is double the current minimum budget allocation, with exceptions for fiscal emergencies?

Reproduced from the City Clerk’s final voter information pamphlet, PDF page 60. The question also matches the separately checked measure PDF.

What your vote does

Yes or No—without a recommendation

These statements restate the action in the official ballot question. Election.org does not rate the measure.

YES

A YES vote would adopt the proposed phased increase to the Recreation and Parks minimum budget allocation, including the stated fiscal-emergency exceptions.

NO

A NO vote would not adopt the proposed Charter change.

City Clerk · Final voter information pamphlet

Read the official guide

The City’s impartial summary and financial statement are separate from the submitted arguments. Arguments are their authors’ opinions and are not checked for accuracy by a City agency.

The official pamphlet states: “NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED.” This describes that publication, rather than whether anyone opposes the measure.

Official impartial summaryPDF pages 60, 61

Open these pages in the official pamphlet ↗

IMPARTIAL SUMMARY BY SHARON M. TSO, CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City. General Fund revenue is used to fund City services such as police, fire, public works, transportation, libraries, and parks. General Fund revenues are derived from taxes, licenses, permits, fees, fines, and other sources. The City Charter establishes a minimum budget allocation for the Department of Recreation and Parks from the General Fund. That minimum budget is an amount equal to 0.0325% of the assessed value of all property as assessed for City taxes. The current City Charter allocation percentage rate and the resulting budget allocation has not kept pace with the growing population, expanding park system, and increasing costs of maintenance and operations. This has contributed to reductions in Recreation and Parks services over time. In 1996, voters approved the passage of the Proposition K: LA for Kids Program (Proposition K) which created a citywide assessment that has generated $25 million annually for the acquisition, development, improvement and restoration of parks and recreational facilities. The Proposition K program will expire in Fiscal Year 2026-27 and will result in the loss of funding to support parks and recreational facilities. This measure would increase the minimum amount of General Fund money allocated to Recreation and Parks. These additional resources would help restore Recreation and Parks service levels, address park equity gaps, and allow the Department to cover the cost of operations and programs. The percentage would gradually increase from the current 0.0325% to 0.065% of the assessed value of all property as assessed for City taxes, phased in over a ten year period as follows: ● Fiscal Years 2026-2027 and prior: 0.0325%; ● Fiscal Year 2027-2028: 0.03575%; ● Fiscal Year 2028-2029: 0.039%; ● Fiscal Year 2029-2030: 0.04225%; ● Fiscal Year 2030-2031: 0.0455%; ● Fiscal Year 2031-2032: 0.04875%; ● Fiscal Year 2032-2033: 0.052%; ● Fiscal Year 2033-2034: 0.05525%; ● Fiscal Year 2034-2035: 0.0585%; ● Fiscal Year 2035-2036: 0.06175%; ● Fiscal Years 2036-2037 and thereafter: 0.065% This measure would not create a new tax or generate additional City revenue. It would require more General Fund money to be provided to Recreation and Parks. Consequently, the amount of General Fund revenue available for other City services will be reduced. During a declared fiscal emergency, the City Council could reduce the increased funding required in this measure by up to 30 percent for the duration of the fiscal emergency. However, Recreation and Parks’ minimum budget allocation could not be reduced below the current level of 0.0325% of assessed value of all property as assessed for City taxes. This measure will become effective if approved by a majority of voters.
Official financial impact statementPDF page 61

Open these pages in the official pamphlet ↗

FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT BY MATTHEW W. SZABO, CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER This measure doubles the Department of Recreation and Parks’ (RAP) property value based appropriation from 0.0325 to 0.065 percent over ten years. Assuming average property value growth, RAP’s funding increases from $303 million to $995 million by 2036-37, with estimated annual increases attributed to the measure as follows: 2027-28 ($32 million), 2028-29 ($66 million), 2029-30 ($105 million), 2030-31 ($147 million), 2031-32 ($193 million), 2032- 33 ($244 million), 2033-34 ($299 million), 2034-35 ($359 million), 2035-36 ($426 million), and 2036-37 ($497 million). All increases during this period are subject to actual assessed property value growth. Because this measure does not raise new revenues, the City must reallocate resources from other services, including public safety, public works, and homeless services to meet the increased funding mandate. The City may suspend the mandated increase during a declared fiscal emergency. RAP remains responsible for reimbursing the General Fund for employee benefits and other related costs.
Argument in favor of charter amendment prkPDF pages 62, 63

Open these pages in the official pamphlet ↗

ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF CHARTER AMENDMENT PRK Charter Amendment PRK will keep our parks, waters, and beaches clean; repair and maintain park facilities; and keep recreation and senior centers open without raising taxes by a single penny. LA’s parks department runs over 500 parks, 123 recreation and senior centers, and 52 pools. These are affordable places for kids to play sports and stay safe after-school and in summer, for seniors to find services, and for families to gather. Parks and recreation centers host violence- intervention programs and provide services and shelter during wildfires and emergencies. LA’s parks dropped to 93rd of America’s 100 largest cities in Trust for Public Land’s 2026 ParkScore ranking. The City’s parks assessment found LA funds parks two-thirds less than similar cities. Large staffing cuts mean parks are less safe and clean. Facilities need almost $3 billion in repairs, and pools, recreation, and senior centers have cut hours. Without action, more may close. One-third of Angelenos lack a park within a ten-minute walk of home. Parks are critical services for Angelenos. Protected parks funding has not increased since 1937, and money going directly to parks was reduced further since 2009. PRK increases parks funding over 10 years, with protections for fiscal emergencies. PRK will clean and improve parks, restrooms, pools and facilities; rebuild the parks and ranger workforce; protect beaches and coastal waters; build new parks where they’re needed; restore natural areas; and invest in shade trees, wildfire prevention and nature-based solutions to protect our water. It keeps pools and recreation and senior centers open and activates community school parks. This funding requires strict fiscal accountability, and must be used only for eligible park purposes, with annual expenditure plans and reporting reviewed at public meetings and posted online. Join community and environmental leaders to vote YES on PRK to fix parks without raising taxes. PERSONS SIGNING ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF CHARTER AMENDMENT PRK MONICA RODRIGUEZ TEFARAI BAYNE Councilmember Commissioner City of Los Angeles LA Department of Recreation and Parks YSABEL JURADO BRUCE SAITO Councilmember Founder City of Los Angeles Conservation and Youth Workforce Development Leader IMELDA PADILLA Councilmember NICOLE CHASE City of Los Angeles President & CEO Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley KENNETH MEJIA Controller TORI KJER City of Los Angeles Executive Director LA Neighborhood Land Trust FATHER GREGORY BOYLE Founder BRUCE REZNIK Homeboy Industries Executive Director LA Waterkeeper NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED. Arguments printed are the opinions of the authors and are not checked for accuracy by any City agency. In addition, the title beneath a signer’s name is for identification purposes only and does not indicate that the individual is signing on behalf of the organization.
Rebuttal argument in favor of charter amendment prkPDF page 64

Open these pages in the official pamphlet ↗

REBUTTAL ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF CHARTER AMENDMENT PRK Charter Amendment PRK is a responsible investment in parks, without raising taxes. Over 10 years, PRK will increase dedicated funding for parks while requiring strict accountability for every dollar spent. Parks are a good investment. Parks keep Angelenos healthy, active and connected. Physical inactivity accounts for 12.6% of healthcare costs. Research shows communities investing in parks have lower rates of stroke, heart disease, obesity, and diabetes. Every $1 spent on park programming lowers healthcare costs by $11. Additionally, every $1 spent maintaining parks returns at least $3 in broader economic benefits. Tourism generated $35.1 billion in spending last year in Los Angeles, supporting over 224,000 jobs. Griffith Park and Venice Beach, both city parks, are among our biggest draws. PRK will create good, local jobs, improve public health, maintain safe children’s play areas, fully re-open recreation and senior centers, keep beaches clean, and repair restrooms citywide. Vote YES on PRK. PERSONS SIGNING REBUTTAL ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF CHARTER AMENDMENT PRK MONICA RODRIGUEZ JIMMY KIM LA City Councilwoman General Manager LA Department of Recreation and Parks IMELDA PADILLA LA City Councilmember JON CHRISTENSEN Adjunct Assistant Professor YSABEL JURADO UCLA LA City Councilmember AMBER MARTINEZ KENNETH MEJIA President & CEO LA City Controller Los Angeles Parks Foundation LUIS A SANCHEZ DEBORAH COHEN, MD, MPH President Public Health & Preventative Medicine LA Rec and Parks Board of Commissioners MONA FIELD Past President Greater Los Angeles League of Women Voters Arguments printed are the opinions of the authors and are not checked for accuracy by any City agency. In addition, the title beneath a signer’s name is for identification purposes only and does not indicate that the individual is signing on behalf of the organization.

The source wording is reproduced with line breaks preserved; running headers, footers and page numbers are removed. Read the linked PDF for its printed layout and signature columns. Original spelling and attributed claims remain as published.