election.org
Election.orgRaces & polls
Search public records
Menu
Elections/Michigan/2026 U.S. Senate
Permanent contest record · 2026 federal election

2026 Michigan U.S. Senate Election.

See official November candidate lists, registered write-ins where verified, polling and voting information. Earlier FEC filings are kept in the history below.

U.S. SenateMichigan U.S. SenateGeneral: November 3, 20266 November ballot names

Make your voting plan

Michigan
Check my registrationOfficial status lookup ↗Find my polling placeOfficial locations and hours ↗Deadlines and rulesCheck your state’s sources →

Who is on the November ballot?

November 3, 2026 · 6 printed ballot names · alphabetical

Official November list checked .

November write-in information

Write-in rules and filing deadlines vary by office and state. Check the current official list; the printed roster alone does not establish whether write-ins are eligible. Official write-in information ↗

FEC filing history (25 filing groups; 25 IDs)

This archive includes primary candidates and other filers. Inclusion here does not establish a November ballot place. Reported financial activity first, then names alphabetically; reviewed duplicate committee summaries are counted once.

Republican Party

Bernadette Smith

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00517 ↗
Receipts
$77,255.20
Spent
$73,459.17
Cash
$3,796.03

Through · Last successful import

Republican Party

Frederick Heurtebise

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00384 ↗
Receipts
$10,058.60
Spent
$10,058.60
Cash
$0.00

Through · Last successful import

Democratic Party

Gary C. Peters

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S4MI00355 ↗
Receipts
$303,094.43
Spent
$871,955.19
Cash
$6,559,468.71

Through · Last successful import

Republican Party

Genevieve Scott

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00434 ↗
Receipts
$83,079.23
Spent
$80,540.62
Cash
$2,538.61

Through · Last successful import

Democratic Party

Haley M. Stevens

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00426 ↗
Receipts
$13,304,161.60
Spent
$13,151,823.43
Cash
$152,338.17

Through · Last successful import

Democratic Party

Joseph Allen Tate

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00459 ↗
Receipts
$243,635.76
Spent
$243,635.76
Cash
$0.00

Through · Last successful import

Democratic Party

Mallory McMorrow

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00392 ↗
Receipts
$11,405,911.71
Spent
$10,992,326.28
Cash
$413,585.43

Through · Last successful import

Democratic Party

Rachel Elizabeth Howard

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00467 ↗
Receipts
$10,937.00
Spent
$6,170.77
Cash
$4,766.23

Through · Last successful import

Show 15 more filing records
No Party Affiliation

Thomas Wayne Stephens

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00509 ↗
Receipts
$1,000.00
Spent
$220.48
Cash
$779.52

Through · Last successful import

Republican Party

Andrew Kamal

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00491 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Independent

Craig Henley Johnson II II

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00475 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Republican Party

Gavin Solomon

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00574 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Republican Party

Gavin Solomon

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00582 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Independence Party

Jason Sherman

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00533 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Republican Party

Kent Benham

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00400 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Republican Party

Marnisha Breche Braggs

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00558 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Party not listed

Robert Kovaly

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00541 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Democratic Party

Travis Joseph Zollner

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S6MI00483 ↗

No FEC financial summary processed in this import. Check the candidate’s FEC filings ↗

Independent

Valerie Lee Willis

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot. This FEC filing does not appear in the reviewed official printed November field for this exact contest. Registered write-ins are tracked separately where an official list is available. Absence does not establish a primary loss or withdrawal. Official stage source ↗

Not on the reviewed printed November ballot · Verified ↗
Candidate record →FEC S8MI00422 ↗
Receipts
$0.00
Spent
$0.00
Cash
$0.00

Through · Last successful import

Dates for November 3

Download calendar ↓

Partial coverage: only the dated entries below have been checked. Confirm other deadlines and exceptions with your election office.

Michigan · Sourced election dates
ActionDateDetails and source
Register online
Today		Last day to register online for this election.
Official source ↗
Register by mail
Today		Last day to register by mail; after this date use your local clerk in person.
Official source ↗
Register in person
15 days left		Register with proof of residency at your local clerk through 8 p.m. Election Day.
Official source ↗
Early voting begins
5 days left		Statewide required early-voting period begins; some communities offer additional days.
Official source ↗
Early voting ends
13 days left		Statewide required early-voting period ends; check local optional Monday voting.
Official source ↗
Return ballot
15 days left		Domestic ballots must reach the clerk by 8 p.m.; military/overseas rules differ.
Official source ↗

In-person registration remains available October 20–November 3 at your local clerk; bring residency documentation. Source ↗

Checked 2026-10-16. Confirm local details and exceptions with your election office.

POLLING · SURVEYS, NOT PREDICTIONS

What do the polls say?

67 survey records

Individual surveys of 2026 contests, including earlier cycle history from 2025. Matchups and populations stay separate; older or hypothetical matchups do not establish who is on the current ballot.

Simple average, not a forecast

Each pollster’s latest general-election survey ending within the last 30 days, with equal weight. Reviewed candidate identities join spelling variants; different matchups and voter populations stay separate. Percentages describe reported support, not a chance of winning.

Newest fieldwork appears first. When dates tie, the default favors more pollsters not marked internal or partisan in this 30-day window. Source labels remain visible; this is not a pollster-quality rating.

Likely voters · 4 polls · 1 of 4 internal or partisan surveys

Sep 15, 2026–Oct 8, 2026 · Lead between the two highest answers: 1.0 percentage points

Reported answerAverage support
Abdul El-Sayed48.3%
Michael J Rogers47.3%
Included surveys & calculation

Add each answer’s reported support across these 4 surveys and divide by 4. No house effects, sample weights, undecided allocation or error band is applied. Incomplete numeric matchups are excluded from this calculation but remain in the survey history. Full methodology →

Likely voters · 5 polls · 1 of 5 internal or partisan surveys

Sep 16, 2026–Oct 1, 2026 · Lead between the two highest answers: 4.8 percentage points

Reported answerAverage support
Abdul El-Sayed46.6%
Michael J Rogers41.8%
Lydia Lynn Christensen1.6%
Tim Long0.6%
Walter P. Kristy0.6%
Douglas P. Marsh0.2%
Included surveys & calculation

Add each answer’s reported support across these 5 surveys and divide by 5. No house effects, sample weights, undecided allocation or error band is applied. Incomplete numeric matchups are excluded from this calculation but remain in the survey history. Full methodology →

Likely voters · 1 poll · partisan sponsor (DEM)

Sep 28, 2026–Oct 1, 2026 · Lead between the two highest answers: 7.0 percentage points

Reported answerAverage support
Abdul El-Sayed49.0%
Michael J Rogers42.0%
Lydia Lynn Christensen3.0%
Included surveys & calculation

Add each answer’s reported support across these 1 surveys and divide by 1. No house effects, sample weights, undecided allocation or error band is applied. Incomplete numeric matchups are excluded from this calculation but remain in the survey history. Full methodology →

Hover or tap a date to see the survey and source.

Polling history for the selected matchup23 survey observations. Vertical scale: reported support from 0 to 60 percent. Select a survey date to read its source. Arrow keys move between dates. Exact figures and source links follow in the survey reports.0%15%30%45%60%Abdul El-Sayed: 44% · The Tyson Group · Oct 8, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/10/15/exclusive-poll-shows-mike-rogers-edging-out-abdul-el-sayed-in-michigan-senate-race/Abdul El-Sayed: 50% · Beacon Research/Shaw & Co. Research · Sep 28, 2026 · 1,028 people surveyed · https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-michigan-voters-split-between-el-sayed-rogersAbdul El-Sayed: 44% · The Tyson Group · Sep 27, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/10/15/exclusive-poll-shows-mike-rogers-edging-out-abdul-el-sayed-in-michigan-senate-race/Abdul El-Sayed: 50% · co/efficient · Sep 23, 2026 · 843 people surveyed · https://battlegrounds.coefficient.org/mi/Abdul El-Sayed: 49% · The New York Times/Siena University · Sep 22, 2026 · 605 people surveyed · https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/us/politics/democrats-show-strength-in-michigan-senate-race-but-trail-in-maine-polls-find.htmlAbdul El-Sayed: 48% · The Washington Post/George Mason University School of Policy and Government · Sep 14, 2026 · 803 people surveyed · https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/08fa9b5e-43ac-456c-a706-4c33ec6506dc.pdfAbdul El-Sayed: 47% · EPIC-MRA · Aug 28, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://drive.google.com/file/d/1flmzB5xpdJ6Noa-3hAbms0vBml6KwAxy/view?usp=sharingAbdul El-Sayed: 50% · Michigan State University Institute for Public Policy and Social Research/YouGov · Aug 20, 2026 · 779 people surveyed · https://ippsr.msu.edu/news/msu-poll-shows-democrats-lead-republicans-coalesce-behind-rogersAbdul El-Sayed: 48% · Fabrizio, Lee & Associates/Impact Research · Aug 11, 2026 · 877 people surveyed · https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/voter-research/politics/2026-midterm-election-poll-michigan/Abdul El-Sayed: 50% · GBAO Strategies · Aug 10, 2026 · 800 people surveyed · https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2026/08/15/what-burritos-tell-us-about-capitalism-01038859Abdul El-Sayed: 41% · SoCal Strategies · Jul 30, 2026 · 640 people surveyed · https://socalstrategies.substack.com/p/abdul-el-sayed-holds-17-point-primaryAbdul El-Sayed: 45% · Mitchell Research & Communications · Jul 29, 2026 · 672 people surveyed · https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f14ae6fb2a20e01e9c6d608/t/6a6d26262f442f133d15fa49/1785538087149/MITCHELL+MI+Poll+Nov+Electio+Press+Release+7-31-2026+305PM_A.pdfAbdul El-Sayed: 38.7% · Glengariff Group, Inc. · Jul 24, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://mea.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MICHIGAN-EDUCATION-SURVEY-REPORT-FINAL54.pdfAbdul El-Sayed: 45.2% · Quantus Insights · Jun 30, 2026 · 947 people surveyed · https://quantusinsights.org/f/michigan-senate-el-sayed-leads-primary-fall-race-remains-tightAbdul El-Sayed: 45% · Zenith Research · Jun 14, 2026 · 602 people surveyed · https://x.com/admcrlsn/status/2067419019544555546Abdul El-Sayed: 46% · Tulchin Research · Jun 4, 2026 · 500 people surveyed · https://drive.google.com/file/d/15KbOIW_L4iGdkgIbMWDr2m80N0ZUr3d3/viewAbdul El-Sayed: 43% · TIPP Insights · May 23, 2026 · 1,163 people surveyed · https://tippinsights.com/league-of-american-workers-survey-michiganAbdul El-Sayed: 42% · Mitchell Research & Communications · May 7, 2026 · 607 people surveyed · https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/852uovvc2zfsqrnphdn9q/MIRS-MITCHELL-DEM-Primary-Press-Release-5-11-26-150PM_A.docx?rlkey=v522wmle6zvzlajt6m6nfoj78&st=zhm55ihc&dl=0Abdul El-Sayed: 40% · Glengariff Group, Inc. · May 1, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.detroitchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/DRC_Glengariff-Group_2026-Mackinac-Policy-Conference_POLITICAL-REPORT.pdfAbdul El-Sayed: 42.5% · Emerson College · Jan 25, 2026 · 1,000 people surveyed · https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AtLJcs2z9R_NRY7eZqvKS256qHiVSUx0/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=111479937799022047482&rtpof=true&sd=trueAbdul El-Sayed: 42% · Glengariff Group, Inc. · Jan 6, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2026/01/13/michigan-race-for-governor-polling-john-james-jocelyn-benson-mike-duggan/88134923007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=false&gca-epti=undefined&gca-ft=0&gca-ds=sophiAbdul El-Sayed: 38% · Mitchell Research & Communications · Nov 21, 2025 · 616 people surveyed · https://mirs-polls.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/c7ba70f28c3812c553cbf07db509f469.pdfAbdul El-Sayed: 31% · Rosetta Stone · Oct 25, 2025 · 637 people surveyed · https://x.com/IAPolls2022/status/1986533537747472500Michael J Rogers: 46% · The Tyson Group · Oct 8, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/10/15/exclusive-poll-shows-mike-rogers-edging-out-abdul-el-sayed-in-michigan-senate-race/Michael J Rogers: 49% · Beacon Research/Shaw & Co. Research · Sep 28, 2026 · 1,028 people surveyed · https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-michigan-voters-split-between-el-sayed-rogersMichael J Rogers: 43% · The Tyson Group · Sep 27, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/10/15/exclusive-poll-shows-mike-rogers-edging-out-abdul-el-sayed-in-michigan-senate-race/Michael J Rogers: 50% · co/efficient · Sep 23, 2026 · 843 people surveyed · https://battlegrounds.coefficient.org/mi/Michael J Rogers: 44% · The New York Times/Siena University · Sep 22, 2026 · 605 people surveyed · https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/us/politics/democrats-show-strength-in-michigan-senate-race-but-trail-in-maine-polls-find.htmlMichael J Rogers: 45% · The Washington Post/George Mason University School of Policy and Government · Sep 14, 2026 · 803 people surveyed · https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/08fa9b5e-43ac-456c-a706-4c33ec6506dc.pdfMichael J Rogers: 43% · EPIC-MRA · Aug 28, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://drive.google.com/file/d/1flmzB5xpdJ6Noa-3hAbms0vBml6KwAxy/view?usp=sharingMichael J Rogers: 45% · Michigan State University Institute for Public Policy and Social Research/YouGov · Aug 20, 2026 · 779 people surveyed · https://ippsr.msu.edu/news/msu-poll-shows-democrats-lead-republicans-coalesce-behind-rogersMichael J Rogers: 47% · Fabrizio, Lee & Associates/Impact Research · Aug 11, 2026 · 877 people surveyed · https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/voter-research/politics/2026-midterm-election-poll-michigan/Michael J Rogers: 44% · GBAO Strategies · Aug 10, 2026 · 800 people surveyed · https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2026/08/15/what-burritos-tell-us-about-capitalism-01038859Michael J Rogers: 42% · SoCal Strategies · Jul 30, 2026 · 640 people surveyed · https://socalstrategies.substack.com/p/abdul-el-sayed-holds-17-point-primaryMichael J Rogers: 45% · Mitchell Research & Communications · Jul 29, 2026 · 672 people surveyed · https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f14ae6fb2a20e01e9c6d608/t/6a6d26262f442f133d15fa49/1785538087149/MITCHELL+MI+Poll+Nov+Electio+Press+Release+7-31-2026+305PM_A.pdfMichael J Rogers: 49% · Glengariff Group, Inc. · Jul 24, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://mea.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MICHIGAN-EDUCATION-SURVEY-REPORT-FINAL54.pdfMichael J Rogers: 44.1% · Quantus Insights · Jun 30, 2026 · 947 people surveyed · https://quantusinsights.org/f/michigan-senate-el-sayed-leads-primary-fall-race-remains-tightMichael J Rogers: 42% · Zenith Research · Jun 14, 2026 · 602 people surveyed · https://x.com/admcrlsn/status/2067419019544555546Michael J Rogers: 41% · Tulchin Research · Jun 4, 2026 · 500 people surveyed · https://drive.google.com/file/d/15KbOIW_L4iGdkgIbMWDr2m80N0ZUr3d3/viewMichael J Rogers: 42% · TIPP Insights · May 23, 2026 · 1,163 people surveyed · https://tippinsights.com/league-of-american-workers-survey-michiganMichael J Rogers: 41% · Mitchell Research & Communications · May 7, 2026 · 607 people surveyed · https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/852uovvc2zfsqrnphdn9q/MIRS-MITCHELL-DEM-Primary-Press-Release-5-11-26-150PM_A.docx?rlkey=v522wmle6zvzlajt6m6nfoj78&st=zhm55ihc&dl=0Michael J Rogers: 45% · Glengariff Group, Inc. · May 1, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.detroitchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/DRC_Glengariff-Group_2026-Mackinac-Policy-Conference_POLITICAL-REPORT.pdfMichael J Rogers: 42.8% · Emerson College · Jan 25, 2026 · 1,000 people surveyed · https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AtLJcs2z9R_NRY7eZqvKS256qHiVSUx0/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=111479937799022047482&rtpof=true&sd=trueMichael J Rogers: 48% · Glengariff Group, Inc. · Jan 6, 2026 · 600 people surveyed · https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2026/01/13/michigan-race-for-governor-polling-john-james-jocelyn-benson-mike-duggan/88134923007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=false&gca-epti=undefined&gca-ft=0&gca-ds=sophiMichael J Rogers: 41% · Mitchell Research & Communications · Nov 21, 2025 · 616 people surveyed · https://mirs-polls.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/c7ba70f28c3812c553cbf07db509f469.pdfMichael J Rogers: 45% · Rosetta Stone · Oct 25, 2025 · 637 people surveyed · https://x.com/IAPolls2022/status/1986533537747472500Oct 25, 2025Oct 8, 2026
Abdul El-SayedMichael J Rogers

Party colors: Republican red, Democratic blue, Independent purple. Other or unmatched affiliations are gray. Dash patterns distinguish candidates sharing a color.

Dots show reported support. Lines connect surveys over time—not an average or forecast. Pollsters can differ. Missing values and multiple surveys ending on the same date break the lines.

How to read this chart

No average, trend estimate, or win probability. Different matchups and populations are not combined. Dates mark the last day people were surveyed. The vertical scale always starts at zero; use “Full 0–100% scale” to compare charts on the same scale. The number of people surveyed is the survey sample size, not the number supporting a candidate. Select “Survey source” to inspect every report, including overlapping dots.

Latest surveys · selected matchup

Individual reports. Original sources and methodology below.

2026 Michigan

The Tyson Group

Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
600 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Alliance for a Better Future
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
REP
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202thed1db38e3
Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
1,028 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Fox News
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
Not supplied
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202beac0286b40
2026 Michigan

The Tyson Group

Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
600 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Alliance for a Better Future
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
REP
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202thee5a838a4
2026 Michigan

co/efficient

Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
843 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Not supplied in this feed
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
Not supplied
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202co/b838141c
Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
605 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Not supplied in this feed
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
Not supplied
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202thecf4746de
Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
803 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Not supplied in this feed
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
Not supplied
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202the9066d3a5
2026 Michigan

EPIC-MRA

Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
600 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Not supplied in this feed
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
Not supplied
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202epi5f481027
Fieldwork –
Reported support

0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically

Sample
779 people surveyed
Population
Likely voters
Survey details & methodology
Reported margin of error
Not supplied in this feed
Method
Not supplied in this feed
Sponsors
Not supplied in this feed
Pollster/sponsor partisan label
Not supplied
Internal poll
Not marked internal by provider
Added by provider
Provider ID
us-202micb55519f5

Labels and figures are supplied by VoteHub. A listed matchup does not establish ballot qualification or primary/general-election status unless the source explicitly says so. Unlisted responses may include undecided voters or other choices; the displayed figures are not rescaled to total 100%.

Polling compilation: VoteHub · CC BY 4.0. Election.org normalizes dates, matches races, and visualizes reported results; it does not estimate outcomes. Original survey links are attached to each report.

Automatic hourly sync. Across all feeds, the latest survey ended 2026-10-15. Check the field dates above for this selection. Feed update status →

Last successful feed updates
  • Senate: 10/20/2026, 2:17:20 AM UTC · 474 survey records
  • House: 10/20/2026, 2:17:20 AM UTC · 133 survey records
  • Governor: 10/20/2026, 2:17:20 AM UTC · 349 survey records
  • National preference: 10/20/2026, 2:17:20 AM UTC · 546 survey records

An update time is when we checked the feed, not when a survey was conducted. Coverage is not exhaustive.

FEC FILING RECORDS2512 distinct current financial summaries
REPORTED RECEIPTS$60,519,175.84Available summaries; shared principal-committee money counted once
REPORTED SPENDING$51,685,702.75Not outside spending
Published election schedule

Election dates

DATES MAY CHANGE
PRIMARYAugust 4, 2026FEC congressional primary calendar
GENERALNovember 3, 2026Regular federal general election.

The FEC publishes this calendar but does not administer elections. State and local election officials determine ballot access, voting methods, and official candidate lists.

Sources and filing coverage
FILING RECORDS

Not the certified ballot.

Seat identity and the election schedule are verified separately from FEC filings. A filing does not establish ballot qualification.

How to use this race page

November candidate names come from the official general-election sources linked beside each person. Registered write-ins have their own list. FEC filing history preserves earlier primary and other campaign records; filing or fundraising alone does not establish November eligibility. Confirm your full local sample ballot with the election authority.

No verified prediction-market match is connected for this race yet. See national House and Senate market prices →

Continue researching

Keep exploring Michigan.

Follow the people, the money, and the official election information.