Publication and claim review
Identify the original publisher, article URL, publication date and the exact statement or exposure in question.
Donations of $100 or more include a 15-minute call with Election.org’s founder to talk about the future of the platform and democracy.
We’ll arrange your call by email after your donation.Opens Stripe directly. You can change your amount before paying.
Continue to StripeOne-time support · No subscription · Opens in a new tab
Prefer monthly support? Become a member →Election.org is operated by Election Powerhouse, Inc. We do not promise a tax deduction. Who runs Election.org
Find the right remedy for a documented concern.
An inaccurate article, a privacy issue and an outdated search result need different responses. Begin with the exact publication and evidence so the request fits the concern instead of promising to erase the internet.
Request a scoped quote anthony@election.orgCustom quote. Availability and deliverables confirmed before work begins.
Confirm what is included, what is not and who approves it.
Identify the original publisher, article URL, publication date and the exact statement or exposure in question.
Separate a verifiable factual error from opinion or disagreement. Document proposed corrections and their supporting source.
Assess whether a correction, update, publisher request or eligible delisting process matches the issue. Qualified counsel may be necessary for legal claims.
Distinguish the original page, syndicated copies and search results. Confirm which URLs and follow-up steps the engagement covers.
Share public URLs and a concise factual explanation; arrange a secure route for sensitive evidence if needed.
Review evidence and the publisher or search process before agreeing work, fees and limitations.
Track the response and distinguish a correction or delisting from deletion of the original publication.
No. Publishers, search providers and any relevant legal process make their own decisions. Copies, archives and search results may require separate consideration.
A correction changes an identified factual error; removal takes down a publication at its source. Search delisting affects eligible results without necessarily changing the original article. The appropriate remedy depends on the evidence.
No. Public-record corrections follow the same free, sourced correction process for everyone. Buying a service does not buy a hidden record, favorable wording or a higher position.
Tell Anthony what you need, your timeline and what is ready. Pricing and availability are confirmed in a written quote.
These are commercial services, separate from Election.org’s nonpartisan public record. Payment never buys favorable coverage, a ranking, a hidden correction or a change to political facts.
Public-record corrections are always free →