Iowa U.S. Senate
Democratic PartyJoshua Turek is included in the 2026 FEC filing records for Iowa U.S. Senate. Explore the available source records below. A federal filing does not establish ballot qualification.
Email jackson@election.org from your official campaign email to add a website or request updates. We review requests before publishing.
Claim this pageOn the November ballot · Official November list ↗ · checked 2026-10-16
$6,276,526.90 in total campaign receipts.
$5,835,816.67 is reported as individual contributions. Total receipts can also include transfers, offsets, loans, and other FEC receipt categories, so it is broader than donations alone.
Through · Last successful import
Official sourceFederal Election Commission · data through .
This chronology combines dated FEC filing coverage with the official 2026 congressional election calendar. It does not predict qualification, outcomes, or whether a conditional runoff will occur.
Congressional primary date listed in the FEC's 2026 calendar.
Official election schedule · schedule subject to changeEnd date of the candidate financial summary in Election.org's current FEC bulk-data release.
FEC · included source coverageMost recent itemized direct contribution or coordinated-party-expenditure row involving this candidate in the current FEC transaction release.
FEC · included source coverageMost recent reported dissemination or expenditure date involving this candidate in the current FEC independent-expenditure release.
FEC · included source coverageElection schedule for the verified seat, not proof of this person's ballot qualification. State and local election officials administer elections.
Official election schedule · schedule subject to changeElection dates are transcribed from the FEC's calendar as published and are subject to change. The FEC does not administer elections; confirm dates and ballot status with the relevant state election authority.
| Metric | Reported amount | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Total receipts | $6,276,526.90 | All campaign receipts reported in the FEC summary, not only individual donations. |
| Individual contributions | $5,835,816.67 | Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category. |
| Candidate contributions | $0.00 | Contributions from the candidate in the summary record. |
| Total disbursements | $3,914,213.12 | Campaign spending and other disbursements reported for the cycle. |
| Cash on hand | $2,362,313.78 | Reported campaign cash remaining at the end of the covered period. |
| Debts owed by campaign | $0.00 | Outstanding debts the campaign reported owing. |
| Net cash after reported debt | $2,362,313.78 | Election.org calculation: cash on hand minus debts owed by the campaign. |
Dollar amounts preserve the cents in the FEC record. These figures are campaign-finance totals, not personal wealth, polling, odds, endorsements, or Election.org scores.
Direct campaign support and independent spending are not combined. Support and opposition below are the positions reported by the spender to the Federal Election Commission.
Money reported as given to a candidate or candidate committee. It enters the recipient committee’s campaign-finance record.
Party spending reported in the FEC’s coordinated-expenditure category. It is separate from a direct contribution.
Outside spending expressly supporting or opposing a candidate. By definition, it is not made in coordination with the candidate or party.
Showing 5 of 75 groups, ordered by absolute reported amount. Totals include all accepted source rows.
Showing 5 of 27 groups, ordered by absolute reported amount. Totals include all accepted source rows.
Inspect purpose, payee, dates, amount, filer-reported position, and exact FEC filing. These records are finance disclosures, not ad creatives.
Source: FEC contributions-from-committees-to-candidates and independent-expenditure bulk files, checked Oct 16, 2026. Committee transactions retain only the latest filing version for stable transaction IDs. Independent-expenditure rows from superseded filings are removed through the FEC previous-filing chain. Memo entries remain included because the FEC bulk-file documentation instructs analysts to include them.
These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.
Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.
Only committee/month cells with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. A missing cell can reflect source absence or the privacy threshold; it does not mean zero activity. Published amounts are unchanged.
Source: FEC individual-contributions bulk file ↗, imported . This panel does not include PAC receipts.
State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.
Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. Percentages divide by the sum of all positive published, privacy-thresholded committee/state cells, including cells beyond the top 12 shown. Zero and negative state cells are excluded from this denominator; these shares do not describe all contributions or all campaign receipts.
Source: FEC individual-contributions bulk file ↗, imported .
FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.
Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.
Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-10-16. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.
These totals combine itemized contributions from individuals who reported the same employer. They do not show that the employer directed, funded, or endorsed any contribution.
Only employer/recipient groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published, with at most 50 groups per recipient committee. Individual names and addresses are not included. Totals are net current-file amounts after amendment normalization and may include refunds, reattributions, or memo entries.
These are Election.org calculations from the displayed FEC totals, included to make the filing easier to understand. They are descriptive, not a score or comparison.
S6IA00298These links are a neutral path through other public 2026 FEC records filed for the same office. Appearance here does not establish ballot qualification.
Browse every Iowa candidate record →FEC registration means this person has a federal candidate record or appeared in a federal candidate filing. State election authorities determine ballot access. Election.org presents the filing without ranking or endorsement. Party labels describe the source affiliation.
Election.org operates at a loss. Donate $50 to fund verifying and adding Joshua Turek’s official donation links to this page, free for everyone after review.
Donate $50 to Election.orgThis payment goes to Election.org. It is not a contribution to Joshua Turek and does not imply their endorsement.
Only confirmed, unrefunded USD gifts credited to this page count toward its $50 research goal. Smaller gifts contribute toward the same goal. Links are published after recipient verification; funding does not guarantee that an eligible, active donation page exists. Published links remain free.
Stripe receives a reference to this page. The public leaderboard shows page totals, never donor names or contact details. We do not promise a tax deduction.
Individual surveys of 2026 contests, including earlier cycle history from 2025. Matchups and populations stay separate; older or hypothetical matchups do not establish who is on the current ballot.
Each pollster’s latest general-election survey ending within the last 30 days, with equal weight. Reviewed candidate identities join spelling variants; different matchups and voter populations stay separate. Percentages describe reported support, not a chance of winning.
Newest fieldwork appears first. When dates tie, the default favors more pollsters not marked internal or partisan in this 30-day window. Source labels remain visible; this is not a pollster-quality rating.
Sep 24, 2026–Oct 12, 2026 · Lead between the two highest answers: 1.0 percentage points
| Reported answer | Average support |
|---|---|
| Joshua Turek | 46.8% |
| Ashley Hinson Arenholz | 45.8% |
Add each answer’s reported support across these 4 surveys and divide by 4. No house effects, sample weights, undecided allocation or error band is applied. Incomplete numeric matchups are excluded from this calculation but remain in the survey history. Full methodology →
Oct 5, 2026–Oct 6, 2026 · Lead between the two highest answers: 1.6 percentage points
| Reported answer | Average support |
|---|---|
| Ashley Hinson Arenholz | 46.6% |
| Joshua Turek | 45.0% |
| Thomas Raymond Laehn | 1.5% |
Add each answer’s reported support across these 1 surveys and divide by 1. No house effects, sample weights, undecided allocation or error band is applied. Incomplete numeric matchups are excluded from this calculation but remain in the survey history. Full methodology →
Sep 17, 2026–Sep 20, 2026 · Lead between the two highest answers: 8.0 percentage points
| Reported answer | Average support |
|---|---|
| Joshua Turek | 50.0% |
| Ashley Hinson Arenholz | 42.0% |
Add each answer’s reported support across these 1 surveys and divide by 1. No house effects, sample weights, undecided allocation or error band is applied. Incomplete numeric matchups are excluded from this calculation but remain in the survey history. Full methodology →
Most recent available observations, not an average or a ranking. Primary, general-election and hypothetical matchups may differ; read the full questions and other candidates’ results below.
Hover or tap a date to see the survey and source.
Party colors: Republican red, Democratic blue, Independent purple. Other or unmatched affiliations are gray. Dash patterns distinguish candidates sharing a color.
Dots show reported support. Lines connect surveys over time—not an average or forecast. Pollsters can differ. Missing values and multiple surveys ending on the same date break the lines.
No average, trend estimate, or win probability. Different matchups and populations are not combined. Dates mark the last day people were surveyed. The vertical scale always starts at zero; use “Full 0–100% scale” to compare charts on the same scale. The number of people surveyed is the survey sample size, not the number supporting a candidate. Select “Survey source” to inspect every report, including overlapping dots.
Individual reports. Original sources and methodology below.
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
0–100% scale · Listed alphabetically
Labels and figures are supplied by VoteHub. A listed matchup does not establish ballot qualification or primary/general-election status unless the source explicitly says so. Unlisted responses may include undecided voters or other choices; the displayed figures are not rescaled to total 100%.
Automatic hourly sync. Across all feeds, the latest survey ended 2026-10-15. Check the field dates above for this selection. Feed update status →
An update time is when we checked the feed, not when a survey was conducted. Coverage is not exhaustive.
Election.org Shop
Explore the shop ↗Original tees for voters, neighbors, and people who show up.
Independent editorial designs; not official campaign products. No funds go to a candidate or political party.